Posted June 25, 2013
Here is a case in which I used my CEREC and Galielos interchangeably. I started with CEREC and scanned the arch for an optiguide, pt was then scanned in Galielos. Fractured bridge from 17-19. We opted to extract #17 and place implants in 18 and 19.
Although I prefer the optiguide for suction and to stabilize, this patient had a big gag reflex so we switched to a bite block.
http://www.Digitalenamel.tvImplant Direct Guide Handle kit
2.3 in the furcation on #19, #17 extracted.
You don’t really need HA o the lower. #19 ended up being a bitch to extract and I removed a lot of bone, so #19 implant drifted a bit to the medial. Still in a good restorative position.
After a few months we switched the el cheapo cover screws with Contour Healers. Look at the tissue profile. For Inlab and CEREC 4.2 this will make your life easier when you go to draw the tissue margin line.
Scan bodies for two TSV 5.7 Ti-bases all scanned in the mouth. Make sure you line up the notch in the Ti-base with the slot in the scan body.
Implant Crowns and Abutments Selected. Gingival Mask scanned.
Split file. Abutment to be done in Zirconia from Infinident. Emax A3.5 LT block milled out chair side.
in 3 days got the zirconia portion milled and sintered by Infinident. Cemented to the Ti-base with Max-Cem Elite. Note, its very important that you line up the notch in the Ti-base with the slot in the abutment.
placed in the mouth, removed the black lines with Orange Solvent prior to cementation.
Crowns in place. The tissue will continue to mature, super easy delivery appointment. Its truly unique how these two technologies work together!
